|
Author
|
Comment
|
basilean32
Unregistered User
(2/27/04 3:51 am)
Reply
|
LK, Think for a moment before...
showing your obvious ignorance yet again.
If the prosecutor sends the crime evidence to the state lab and the state lab's findings do not support the theory being pursued, the prosecution is not likely to continue using said evidence. What is so hard to understand about that?
Yes, the defense will often have to search and search to find a so-called expert witness that may be desperate enough to convince himself and others that the evidence against a defendant is not supportive of the charges against said defendant, even though more times than not, the same witness would NOT testify the same way in a similar case with similar facts. Otherwise, future credibility is hurt as a "hired gun" in future trials. This is more likely to occur in testimony involving a psychiatrist/psychologist because their ramblings may not be based on solid fact, but on mere speculation or otherwise biased opinion. Happens every single day in American jurisprudence (Translation for LK -- system of law).
Further, just to further enlighten you, O one that needs no enlightenment, if DNA is collected, in a rape case for instance, and basically excludes a suspect, they may reconsider prosecuting that suspect unless there was more than one person at the crime scene -- an accomplice that may not have committed the rape, but was known to have helped or been present. They may still pursue a case in a multitude of scenarios based on other evidence collected at the scene or simply go after a case using circumstantial evidence, if strong enough.
DWM likely, in my opinion & based solely on what I have read (your posts generally excluded due to bias), could have been prosecuted successfully without the DNA, but the state lab did uphold the theory. The case may have been more difficult to prove, but the grand jury could always return "no bill" if not strong enough. The jury must have been swayed by the totality of the evidence presented or the defense team just could get the job done. In any case, the jury did not see it your way, thus your boy is currently sitting in a place where he deserves to be for his admitted ILLEGAL drug use, if not the murder that so many firmly believe he committed. Put that in DWM's crack-pipe and smoke it!! 
Legal wranglings aside, I'm glad he is still in the clink. If he gets out...avoid sharp objects.
LOCK YOUR DOORS, FOLKS!!!
|
Linda Kubina
Unregistered User
(2/27/04 11:14 pm)
Reply
|
SOS, basilean32
Your endless drivel (like tipton's) is boring. Who gives a $hit about your 'opinion'? You, MORON, have proved yourself WRONG many more times than I care to even begin to try to count. The jury was convinced, you say?
"The jury must have been swayed by the totality of the evidence presented or the defense team just could get the job done." ~ basilean32
The jury, STUPID, must not have been convinced since the jury came back 'hung'; then compromised by giving Daniel life. Perhaps you can convince david (vra) to post the section from the transcript where the judge admonishs the jury (fat chance!). The jury, MORON, wanted to go home.
"or the defense team just could get the job done." ~ basilean32
Do you, perhaps, mean, "couldn't get the job done"? (yet another correction?) I agree they DIDN'T get the job done. Were they capable? Heck, I don't know...should they have been able? Of course. Daniel's was a case that shouldn't have been lost.
but, nevertheless...
 JUSTICE PREVAILS!
By the way, your drivel concerning the 'grand jury' is nothing more than a joke!
JUSTICE PREVAILS!
|
basilean32
Unregistered User
(2/28/04 12:29 am)
Reply
|
Dismiss the grand jury if you will...
but it was DWM WAS bound over, tried, and convicted. So they gave him life? The judge must have thought it was quite convincing to override the jury's preferred sentence and giving him DEATH!!! Again, may the next trial be even more convincing so justice can prevail -- may it be swift and very final. His victim only got final, but not so swift.
|
Linda Kubina
Unregistered User
(2/28/04 12:46 am)
Reply
|
You'll never learn, will you, STUPID?
basilean32
Unregistered User
(2/28/04 12:29 am)
Reply Dismiss the grand jury if you will...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
but it was DWM WAS bound over, tried, and convicted. So they gave him life? The judge must have thought it was quite convincing to override the jury's preferred sentence and giving him DEATH!!!
"but it was DWM WAS bound over"
HUH?
The Judge, STUPID, was bound by law to give the death sentence. The jury was, as well; seems they weren't to good at following directions. Know anything about mitigating circumstances? None were offered; same as admitting guilt. Bone-up or shut-up, ok?
JUSTICE PREVAILS!
|
true justise
Unregistered User
(2/28/04 12:58 am)
Reply
|
what is DWM is found not guilty
from what I know about the Tipton case.especially with 48 hours investigating it.they might be several people involved I hope not.but you have to admit the Decatur police dept.did coverup alot of evidence.I just hopt the real killer gets whats coming to him.its like comparing the (Tipton) case with the O.J.Simpson case.question how many people on here think O.J.was guilty.the two cases are simular.
|
charlie
Unregistered User
(2/28/04 1:01 am)
Reply
|
add another to the list
add yet another name to the list of DWK names used here:
true justise
very sad, DWK.
very sad.
|
Linda Kubina
Unregistered User
(2/28/04 1:04 am)
Reply
|
found not guilty?
Daniel can never hope for a fair (second) trial since it is fact (revealed at the Jan. 20th hearing) that the prosecution continues to withhold evidence/information (#3-#25)! In all fairness, the Judge has no option but to dismiss with prejudice.
JUSTICE PREVAILS!
|
DWK
Unregistered User
(2/28/04 1:14 am)
Reply
|
Charlie (AKA) the Doc
damit your so smart Charlie.how did you ever figure that out.linda I think ole Charlie might have went to school with Herman what do you think.? charlie did you goto school with Herman & how close were you.
|
charlie
Unregistered User
(2/28/04 1:23 am)
Reply
|
ok, mr. smart guy,
here's your opportunity.
You said
"its like comparing the (Tipton) case with the O.J.Simpson case.question how many people on here think O.J.was guilty.the two cases are simular."
Compare and contrast the two cases. Discuss how they were "simular".
We're waiting...
|
basilean32
Unregistered User
(2/28/04 1:47 am)
Reply
|
Is the Psycho LK getting testy??
Now, now, LK. Your horns are showing once again. Glad you admit that DWM's sentence is not only what he deserves, but is also legally required.
Lethal injection would still be too good for him. Let the new trial begin.
|
DWK
Unregistered User
(2/28/04 1:51 am)
Reply
|
here goes charlie
O.J Simpson & Dr.Tipton was very rich & & well thought of & both Nicole & Karen were brutaly murdered.& both were a crime of passion.& Nicole & Karen were about the same age.both had 2 young kids.they were rumours about Nicole going around like the rumours of Karen.but rumours are usly just that rumours & usly nothing to them.both the cases will always be questions.
|
basilean32
Unregistered User
(2/28/04 2:08 am)
Reply
|
True justise (sic), based on your post...
I'm concerned what little you may know about the case. Must have seen the picture version or did LK try to "school" you with her own drawings of DNA and alleles? Can you say Mixture profile, true justise (sic)? I'm sorry you can't write with proper spelling and grammar. Go to Decatur schools? Pride must abound throughout wherever you went. Like that spirit though!! Is your last name Bodine??  
|
basilean32
Unregistered User
(2/28/04 2:20 am)
Reply
|
Surely, LK, you don't believe that...
I need you to tell me something if good ol' Judge Glenn "MCHS Tiger" Thompson "has no option but to dismiss with prejudice" in the DWM case -- What is he waiting on? Jousting aside -- for the greater good of the people of Morgan County, I certainly hope you lose this one. But regardless, LOCK YOUR DOORS!!
|
Jesse James
Unregistered User
(2/28/04 8:26 am)
Reply
|
you moron Phil Hastings must have taught your lazy assssssss
are you must be related to Herman you moron.its bad when you have to used a speller.?
|
basilean32
Unregistered User
(2/28/04 3:18 pm)
Reply
|
Jesse,
?????
Care to repeat that? To which moron on here are you referring? Unless you are also True Justise (sic), I did not mean to step on your toes.
|
xyz
Unregistered User
(2/28/04 6:13 pm)
Reply
|
Linda still misquoting me
It was me that earlier wrote that it is the prosecution's job to persuade the jury of the defendant's guilt. That's what I wrote, and that's all I wrote. Ever since then YOU've been misquoting me on it. Ever since then you've been claiming that:
--------
Brings to mind an earlier post where someone admitted it is the PROSECUTION'S job to mislead
--------
No one ever said anything about mislead, stupid bitch, except YOU.
|
xyz
Unregistered User
(2/28/04 6:26 pm)
Reply
|
LK is correct on something!
The Judge, STUPID, was bound by law to give the death sentence. The jury was, as well; seems they weren't to good at following directions. Know anything about mitigating circumstances? None were offered; same as admitting guilt. Bone-up or shut-up, ok?
------------------------------
For once, I agree with Kubina. The jury did not follow directions regarding weighing the aggravating versus the mitigating circumstances, or they would have brought back a recommendation for the death penalty.
|
Email This To a Friend
Topic Commands
Click to receive email notification of replies 
Click to stop receiving email notification of replies 