BULLETIN BOARD WEEK 8
The Decatur Daily has another Tipton headline today. They've added a new phrase to
the lexicon--Tipton Probe. Their headline is only news to them, and to those they have
misled in their coverage. No, of course the police didn't withhold the fact the FBI
were "involved." It was in this very newspaper over four years ago...
Furthermore, as I've stated repeatedly on this website, the FBI didn't even send the
"report" to the police--they sent it to a filing cabinet in Birmingham.
Maybe they can do another headline correcting the Daily's and the defense lawyers' lies
about what Valeska said, too. He also never denied the FBI was involved, as they are
saying (it was common knowledge)--he just said they did not do an investigation (which
is verified by the FBI "report" itself, but nobody's quoted that part yet--one of the first
things said on the first page). He denied there was a "profile of the killer," too, and
rightfully so. You'll note they never have quotation marks around anything Valeska
said, although his exact words are readily available and are a matter of public record.
Instead, they have Halbrooks' and Marsh's twisted summary of what he said--presented
as fact. And yet it is presented in headline form, clumsily implying the FBI has somehow
verified evidence was withheld. Of all parties involved in this little sideshow, it's the FBI
that has some explaining to do. Something, incidentally, they were unwilling to do in
trial.
And the Daily could spend years correcting the lies and misconceptions spread just by
their last headline story. They don't check anything. They don't question anything
Halbrooks tells them. They even "correct" an editorial that correctly describes the DNA
match, in order to add her lie. They quote her as the authority on what was said in
court by Bonnie Kidd; the Daily trusts Halbrooks more than they do the witness, the
trial transcript, and what their alleged reporter heard in open court. Catherine Halbrooks
is the one and only source for the Daily's "probes." And she lies so much, no
reasonable person would believe anything she said about anything.
The last thing the Decatur Daily wants to do is actually inform anyone. Rather, they are
purposely misleading the public as part of a campaign of self-promotion and favors to
the good-old-boys. Its goal is to make more money, circumvent justice, and free a
killer. And it is scum like this that claim moral authority over Karen and her survivors.
Daniel Wade Moore was the recipient of a trial profoundly biased in his favor--including
multiple violations of the Rules of Criminal Proceedings and the Code of Ethics of the
Alabama Bar Association--committed or allowed by Judge Glenn Thompson on his
behalf. In spite of this, he was found guilty of four counts of capital murder. Then the
judge overruled the inevitable consequence of his own two years of rulings, giving the
killer another hundred chances to walk free, and giving his friends, the defense lawyers,
another hundred chances to attack the victims further.
When the CCA asked for an explanation from Thompson (WHAT and HOW, with facts
and the law), his answer was, in so many words: "I can't say how it kept him from
getting a fair trial, but it was so bad I should have just let him go."
And when the defense lawyers are asked the same thing, (WHAT and HOW, with facts
and the law), their response is to repeatedly misrepresent material fact, make more
outrageous (indefensible) accusations, and conclude the judge should just let him go.
My take on it is that the defense lawyers really needed a slam dunk from Thompson,
and the best he could do was dribble a little. Let him go? He should be on death row
now.
the lexicon--Tipton Probe. Their headline is only news to them, and to those they have
misled in their coverage. No, of course the police didn't withhold the fact the FBI
were "involved." It was in this very newspaper over four years ago...
Furthermore, as I've stated repeatedly on this website, the FBI didn't even send the
"report" to the police--they sent it to a filing cabinet in Birmingham.
Maybe they can do another headline correcting the Daily's and the defense lawyers' lies
about what Valeska said, too. He also never denied the FBI was involved, as they are
saying (it was common knowledge)--he just said they did not do an investigation (which
is verified by the FBI "report" itself, but nobody's quoted that part yet--one of the first
things said on the first page). He denied there was a "profile of the killer," too, and
rightfully so. You'll note they never have quotation marks around anything Valeska
said, although his exact words are readily available and are a matter of public record.
Instead, they have Halbrooks' and Marsh's twisted summary of what he said--presented
as fact. And yet it is presented in headline form, clumsily implying the FBI has somehow
verified evidence was withheld. Of all parties involved in this little sideshow, it's the FBI
that has some explaining to do. Something, incidentally, they were unwilling to do in
trial.
And the Daily could spend years correcting the lies and misconceptions spread just by
their last headline story. They don't check anything. They don't question anything
Halbrooks tells them. They even "correct" an editorial that correctly describes the DNA
match, in order to add her lie. They quote her as the authority on what was said in
court by Bonnie Kidd; the Daily trusts Halbrooks more than they do the witness, the
trial transcript, and what their alleged reporter heard in open court. Catherine Halbrooks
is the one and only source for the Daily's "probes." And she lies so much, no
reasonable person would believe anything she said about anything.
The last thing the Decatur Daily wants to do is actually inform anyone. Rather, they are
purposely misleading the public as part of a campaign of self-promotion and favors to
the good-old-boys. Its goal is to make more money, circumvent justice, and free a
killer. And it is scum like this that claim moral authority over Karen and her survivors.
Daniel Wade Moore was the recipient of a trial profoundly biased in his favor--including
multiple violations of the Rules of Criminal Proceedings and the Code of Ethics of the
Alabama Bar Association--committed or allowed by Judge Glenn Thompson on his
behalf. In spite of this, he was found guilty of four counts of capital murder. Then the
judge overruled the inevitable consequence of his own two years of rulings, giving the
killer another hundred chances to walk free, and giving his friends, the defense lawyers,
another hundred chances to attack the victims further.
When the CCA asked for an explanation from Thompson (WHAT and HOW, with facts
and the law), his answer was, in so many words: "I can't say how it kept him from
getting a fair trial, but it was so bad I should have just let him go."
And when the defense lawyers are asked the same thing, (WHAT and HOW, with facts
and the law), their response is to repeatedly misrepresent material fact, make more
outrageous (indefensible) accusations, and conclude the judge should just let him go.
My take on it is that the defense lawyers really needed a slam dunk from Thompson,
and the best he could do was dribble a little. Let him go? He should be on death row
now.
48.000
+
+